All of our investigation centers around the connection between a few chief predictor details-actual family unit members on the Twitter and you may wedding inside the Fb Matchmaking Fix Behavior – and you will each other general and you may Twitter-certain bridging public resource. To evaluate the relationship anywhere between both of these different connecting social money, handle parameters, plus the predictors i explain over, we ran a few nested OLS regressions.
In the regression predicting Facebook-specific bridging social capital, the control variables accounted for 5.4% of the variance, with gender (?=.207, p<.001) and self-esteem (?=.098, p<.05) emerging as significant, such that women and those with higher self-esteem reported higher perceived Facebook bridging social capital. The addition of the Facebook usage variables-minutes on Facebook, total Facebook Friends, and actual friends-increased the R 2 to .131, with minutes (?=.144, p<.01) and actual friends (?=.218, p<.001) positively predicting Facebook bridging social capital, supporting H1a. 569, p<.001) increased the model's R 2 to .394 and provided support for H2a. Full results are presented in Table 2.
FRMB analyzes this new the quantity to which sufferers statement they practice affairs that code awareness of and you can intentionally cultivate relationships into the site; such things were replying to Friends’ implicit or explicit resource needs and you may creating “happy birthday celebration” toward an effective Pal’s Wall
In the regression predicting general bridging social capital, the control variables accounted for 9.3% of the variance; as with Facebook-specific bridging social capital, gender (?=.182, p<.001) and self-esteem (?=.255, p<.001) were significant predictors. The addition of the time and Friends variables increased the R 2 to .168. Total Facebook Friends (?=.118, p<.05) emerged as a significant predictor in this model; however, the impact of actual friends (?=.190, p<.001) on general bridging social capital was stronger, supporting H1b. Adding Facebook Relationship Maintenance Behaviors to the model increased the R 2 to .229, and the significant positive relationship between FRMB and bridging social capital (?=.278, p<.001) provided support for H2b. See Table 3 for the full regression model.
Our research question probed the relationship between the number of “actual” friends and users’ engagement in relationship maintenance activities (FRMB), as they relate to bridging social capital. First, we conducted an OLS regression (see Model 4 in Tables 2 and 3) using the same variables as used in previous analyses as well as an interaction term (actual friends by FRMB). The interaction term was significant in both the general (?=?.571, p<.05) and Facebook-specific (?=?.857, p<.001) bridging models, suggesting that the impact of FRMB on bridging social capital may be moderated by users' reported number of actual friends in their Facebook network. The significant negative term indicates that for Facebook users who report fewer actual friends on Facebook, greater engagement in FRMB was correlated with a larger increase in bridging social capital than for users who reported more actual friends on the site.
To further examine this finding, we conducted a simple slopes analysis ( Aiken West, 1991). We observed effects of FRMB on bridging social capital at three levels of actual friends: (1) reported value, (2) reported value minus one standard deviation, and (3) reported value plus one standard deviation. Results indicated that FRMB’s influence on both Facebook-specific and general bridging social capital significantly differed across the three measurement points for actual friends. For all three levels, greater engagement in FRMB was correlated with higher perceived bridging social capital (see Figure 1). However, those with the fewest actual friends saw the greatest gains in bridging social capital as their engagement in FRMB increased. An analysis of variance shows this difference across the three levels of actual friends is significant for Facebook-specific bridging social capital, F(82)= p<.001, and trends towards significance with general bridging social capital, F(86)=3.204 p=.077.
Inside study, i mention the connection anywhere between bridging public funding as well as 2 areas regarding Twitter fool around with courtesy questionnaire investigation accumulated out-of an example out-of U.S. grownups. We operating several independent strategies away from connecting social capital-one to determining advantages for the relations having a person’s circle out of Myspace Family members while the almost every other emphasizing a person’s relations with his or the woman entire social media. Guaranteeing and you will increasing on early in the day training of Fb use ( e.g., Burke mais aussi al., 2011; Ellison et al., 2011), we find high positive relationships anywhere between these tips out-of connecting public financing and the level of “actual” Facebook family people claim that he’s in addition to their engagement in the Fb Relationships Fix Behaviors. This research leads to the understanding of the new social character of SNS explore from the (1) determining just how users’ wedding in the social brushing behavior identified over relate solely to attitudes regarding bridging societal investment-each other within Facebook Friend network in addition to their social networking a great deal more broadly-and you may explicating the interpersonal, architectural, and you may appeal-filtering dynamics and that donate to which relationship; (2) examining the differences between sensed overall and you will “actual” Relatives on the internet site in regards to bridging societal resource outcomes; and (3) exploring variations in attitudes out-of general bridging personal capital anywhere between sites web de rencontres seniors gratuits users and you will nonusers of your own site.